By Mike Hohns The story of what happens to our land as we move away from our farmland is not an easy one to tell.
The most obvious explanation for the discrepancy is that some people have more money to spend on their farms than others.
But what are the causes?
What is the relationship between land values and economic activity?
And why does this work the other way, too?
For decades, scientists have been exploring these questions, and they have found that while there are some major drivers behind the decline in land values, other factors also play a role.
In a new paper published in the Journal of Economic Literature, researchers from the University of Utah and the University at Buffalo, as well as from the Agricultural Marketing Research Service at Cornell University, have explored how land values change over time, focusing on how they affect food production.
They also look at the connection between land value and the number of people that own their farm.
For the new paper, the researchers looked at the history of farm land value over time in the U.S. They compared the number, location, and value of all U.N. land holdings in the United States with the number and location of farms that owned that land.
Then they looked at how land value changed over time.
They found that when farms had higher values, they tended to have fewer people owning them.
In other words, as land value fell, there were fewer people on farms, meaning there were less people to buy and sell land.
This led to fewer people working on farms.
The researchers found that in the past century, the number or location of people owning farms declined from 2.5 percent of the total to 0.3 percent of farms, and the land value of farms declined by about 0.2 percent per year.
To get a better sense of what is driving this trend, they looked further back.
The authors looked at data for the last 100 years, and found that the land values of farms and farms’ total value were similar, but the number on farms increased in the late 19th century, before farmers began moving to cities.
This change in land value also happened because farmers were moving into more urban areas.
The researchers found similar trends for the number in urban areas and the total value of the farms.
In fact, there is evidence that cities have been displacing rural areas for centuries.
But while this land value decline may have been driven by urbanization, it also may have also been driven more by factors beyond the urbanization process.
For instance, it could have been that land values were driven by land values in cities that were relatively low relative to farmland values.
In this way, it’s possible that rural land values could be higher than urban ones due to their relative proximity to cities and due to the relative scarcity of farmland in urban centers.
When it comes to how people moved into farming, there’s a lot of variation.
For example, in the early 1900s, the majority of farms were located in the Midwest and Northeast, but today, there are more farms in the South, West, and Midwest.
As people moved to cities, they also moved to places with more farmland, such as the Pacific Northwest, and that led to a shift in land use.
The change in the way that land was used was one of the reasons for the change in agricultural land values.
It also was possible that some of these rural farmers were more concerned about food security than the quality of the land.
While some rural farmers are more concerned with the health of the soil and the environment, they may not have as much interest in the health or well-being of the people that live on the land or in the surrounding environment.
In other words the people on the farm may be more concerned that they don’t get enough sun and don’t have enough water than the people living nearby.
These factors, and others, led to the change of land values that we see today.
It’s possible the land was valued at lower prices because it was less attractive as a farm site or because it had less value than other types of land.
But as the amount of land in rural areas has decreased, it is likely that farmers have been forced to lower their prices to attract new land buyers.
It is also possible that the value of farmland that is being sold is higher than the value that was actually offered.
So there are multiple factors that contribute to the decline of agricultural land value.
Researchers hope to continue exploring these issues over the next several years, looking at land value trends in the rest of the world.
The research is based on a survey of more than 100,000 households in six countries, with the final sample size for the study being 10,000 individuals.
Follow Mike Haney on Twitter at @mikehaney.
More from Business Insider: